Just another snippet on the death sentence issue...

.

When Jason Jones was arrested in a fatal shooting in the Bronx in May, he told the police that he had been nowhere near the scene. He said he had left work, ridden the bus with some co-workers and cashed his paycheck, and later had taken a subway to see his girlfriend.

Federal prosecutors charged Mr. Jones and his older brother, Corey, in the shooting, saying they had killed the victim because he had been a government witness in drug and gun cases.

Both men could face the death penalty if the government decides to seek it.

But in recent weeks, the case has taken an extraordinary turn — because of Jason Jones’s MetroCard.

Months after the arrests, a retired detective working for Mr. Jones’s lawyers drove to a city jail located on a barge moored in the East River in the South Bronx, where Mr. Jones had been held after his arrest, and retrieved his wallet. The MetroCard was still inside.

Mr. Jones’s lawyers then asked New York City Transit to use the card to trace his movements the night of the shooting. The results supported his account, showing that the card had been used on a bus, and later on a subway roughly five miles from the shooting, just as he had described.

With that, and a photograph snapped of Mr. Jones, 26, as he cashed his paycheck, his lawyers argued that it was impossible for him to have committed the crime. Both brothers have been released on bond for now, an unusual step in a federal murder case, while prosecutors say they are continuing to investigate.

- New York Times.

Makes you think, no?

Now, it is the nature of prosecutors that once they have made an arrest then they defend that position valiantly, even if it means the death of an innocent person. The term is cognitive dissonance and the thought patterns go along the lines of (1) I am a decent person and (2) No decent person would arrest an innocent man. Therefore, as I am a decent man, the accused must really be guilty after all; we just haven't proved it yet.

Do not be surprised if the prosecutors start arguing that the accused hired a look alike to travel on the transport and collect his paycheck.
...

Not justice, vengeance.

.

The three men accused of the Bali Bombing in 2002 were executed by firing squad in Indonesia yesterday.

I don't condone their actions at any level but I am against the death penalty as a punishment.

Who are they punishing?

Not believing in a life, and hence judgement, after death, I find execution does not have the desired affect. A dead person is beyond punishment. Only the living are punished.

1. Death is 'oblivion' to the convicted so they do not live with their crime.
2. It does not help the victims; revenge never does.
3. It is a poor lesson: killing is bad, therefore we will kill you.

The Australian Government did itself, and it's people, no service by not at least trying to intercede. The stand that we are against the death penalty for Australians but will stand by quietly while others are executed is a racist stand, not a moral one.
...